« As Senior IT Workers Retire, Will IT Expertise Also Disappear? | Main | How Much Will You Pay for Friendster's Social Networking Patent? »

What If Communities Don't Share Their Expertise?

silos.jpg

Hello Vietnam! Let me know what you think of this article! Please leave me a comment below!

By Dennis D. McDonald

My friend Luis Suarez takes me to task for my post on expertise management. He makes some very good points but I differ somewhat with how he interprets the role of "communities" within an organization. He says:

Expertise location tools are all about the people, we all know that so in principle one of the most powerful ways to enable location expertise to flourish and succeed in the current business environment is by focusing on the nurturing and fully support of communities, whether they are online or physical communities.

I can't disagree with that, in principle at least. Informal "communities" develop in all organizations, and when you need help, you turn first to the people you know.

But what happens when the people you know -- the members of one of your "communities" -- don't possess the appropriate expertise you need to solve a problem? What if they're not available?

You start calling around. You do some research. In a highly structured organization you go up your chain of command.

But as we have seen with the rapid growth of systems such as MySpace, Linkedin, Facebook, and Flickr, people are willing to use technology to develop and maintain personal networks, and ways are being found to adapt these approaches to what I call "enterprise expertise management."

To call all the relationships such systems address "communities," though, might be premature. Internet based personal networks can be temporary or quite weak and made up of people with only marginally common mutual interests who may never meet face to face.

A variety of formal systems are already available or are under development to help large organizations assist their employees to locate expertise. Here are links to some examples:

What I like in particular about "expertise management" (or "expert location") is that it focuses on connecting people, not on the more general (and potentially much more complex) problem of "knowledge management." It's appropriate to use technology (including email and workflow management) to help people in a large organization to locate an expert to help them answer a question or solve a problem, especially when the technology helps people to develop and maintain relationships. That's why I suggested in my earlier post that nominations by other users -- and ratings of experts by users -- could be part of a functioning expertise management system.

Posted on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 11:03AM by Registered CommenterDennis D. McDonald in , , | Comments5 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Hi Dennis ! Great post, once again ! I am actually enjoying quite a bit the exchange of thoughts we have been having on the subject of expertise location management. Here is my latest take: http://www.elsua.net/2006/07/17/what-if-communities-dont-share-their-expertise-get-them-to-work-with-you-then-2/ and then later on I will add some further comments on your thoughts shared over at elsua.net. Thanks!
July 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterLuis Suarez
Keeping people connected in order to share expertise is a great idea, but the problem is that those people who have a large amount of knowledge tend to grow very large networks.

As each "node" is added to the network, the amount of requests increases. At some point, the person has to stop responding to requests because as a resource, he/she has been tapped out.

I have witnessed this happen. The person ends up closing the door on the community because he has to in order to keep from being bombarded. Then the community gets upset. But I don't see any other way around this.

If the person keeps the door open, then following the rules of economics, his advice becomes much more "expensive", which detracts from the low cost of sharing information.

I would be glad to hear ideas on how this can be avoided.

Paul
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Carney
Paul- Thanks for the comment! I have responded here:

http://www.ddmcd.com/overload.html

- Dennis
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDennis D. McDonald
I know this is old news but it's 'new' news when it's critical to the problem someone is suddenly ready to have you solve. I agree with your take on this. I'll be curious to find out if Luis's take has shifted at all.
September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterPaula Thornton
Paula, one natural result to "gatekeeper overload" is to begin charging a fee of some sort.
September 16, 2008 | Registered CommenterDennis D. McDonald

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.